nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:16:07 -0400
Should. It is a few million$ in man hours thou. ( Not necessary spent, but budgeted ) And still no BCP38 recommendation. I wonder: 1. If they taught of it; 2. What was their process to not include it; Oh well. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 07/30/14 09:57, Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
On 27-07-14 16:15, Livingood, Jason wrote:FYI. The U.S. Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released a Public Notice on Friday (copied below), seeking comment on the “implementation and effectiveness of the CSRIC III recommendations”. Comments are due by September 26. Some folks here may wish to send the FCC comments on this, especially areas pertaining to preventing IP address spoofing.Interesting RFCs. Out of curiosity: do (many) routers already support the necessary ingress filter features to support these RFCs? Kind regards, Pieter Hulshoff
Current thread:
- FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security Livingood, Jason (Jul 27)
- Re: FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security Pieter Hulshoff (Jul 30)
- Re: FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security Alain Hebert (Jul 30)
- Re: FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security Pieter Hulshoff (Jul 30)