nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
From: Jeff Walter <jwalter () weebly com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:01:59 -0700
We also have a Solid Optics CWDM meter and it does the job quite nicely. It feels solid (haha...) and is relatively cheap. -- Jeff Walter On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Neil Davidson <neil () knd org> wrote:
We have the Solid Optics DWDM and CWDM power meters. Simple, inexpensive and works well ... http://www.solid-optics.com/category/cwdm-dwdm/power-meter ... n -- K. Neil Davidson +1-720-258-6345 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net> wrote:On 28/07/14 19:33, Timothy Kaufman wrote:Also maybe the ODPM-48.I've got the CWDM version of this, and it does the job. Haven't explored the test result downloading/archiving features (didn't expect them toworkwith Linux anyway) but overall it was very helpful for measuring loss across various passive muxes (where DDM wasn't available). Tom
Current thread:
- Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Timothy Kaufman (Jul 28)
- RE: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Timothy Kaufman (Jul 28)
- RE: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Timothy Kaufman (Jul 28)
- Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Tom Hill (Jul 28)
- Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Neil Davidson (Jul 28)
- Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Jeff Walter (Jul 30)
- Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter. Tom Hill (Jul 28)