Re: Peering Latency

[Charles N Wyble <charles () thefnf org>]

Is it Friday already? Or is this not a troll email? Its hard to tell. 

If its not a troll: Put up some smokeping boxes. Graph it for a few nights. Gather details. Send us those. That is far 
more interesting/(damning?)

If its a troll: *grabs popcorn and gets comfortable* . we've not had a good "zomg the pipes, they are teh fullz, woe is 
Netflix" (and the obligatory cgn/v6/software vs hardware router sub thread divergences). 

Very nicely struck balance sir! 


On July 2, 2014 11:19:07 PM CDT, Sam Norris <Sam () SanDiegoBroadband com> wrote:
> Hey all - new to the list but not to the community...
>
> Wondering if this is typical when there is too small of a pipe between
> peering
> arrangements:
>
> From Level3 to Time Warner
>
>     ADDRESS                                    STATUS
>   2    4.69.133.206 4ms 4ms 4ms 
>   3    4.69.153.222 9ms 4ms 4ms 
>   4     4.69.158.78 8ms 4ms 4ms  (L3)
>   5    66.109.9.121 28ms 53ms 29ms   (TWC)   <------
>   6    107.14.19.87 30ms 28ms 28ms 
>   7    66.109.6.213 27ms 28ms 28ms 
>   8      72.129.1.1 32ms 32ms 32ms 
>   9      72.129.1.7 27ms 26ms 25ms 
>  10   67.52.158.145 28ms 29ms 31ms 
>
> From TWC to Level3
>
> # ADDRESS                                 RT1   RT2   RT3   STATUS
>
> 2 24.43.183.34                            5ms   5ms   6ms 
> 3 72.129.1.14                             8ms   8ms   8ms
>
> 4 72.129.1.2                              6ms   8ms   8ms
>
> 5 107.14.19.30                            7ms   8ms   8ms
>
> 6 66.109.6.4                              8ms   8ms   8ms
>
> 7 107.14.19.86                            5ms   5ms   5ms
>
> 8 66.109.9.122                            34ms  33ms  31ms  (TWC)   
> <------
>
> 9 4.69.158.65                             31ms  30ms  29ms  (L3)
> 10 4.69.153.221                            33ms  33ms  34ms  
> 11 4.69.133.205                            32ms  32ms  31ms
>
>
> I am showing, typically at night, a 20-40ms jump when hopping from
> Level3 to
> Time Warner and back in Tustin, CA.  This does not happen when using
> Cogent or
> other blended providers bandwidth.   I believe they are probably
> stuffing too
> many bits thru the peering there and wondering whats the best way to
> prove to
> them both (we pay for both) that they need to fix it.
>
> During non-peak traffic times these look normal (sub 10s).
>
> Sam
>
>
> !DSPAM:53b5890e239912186872586!

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.