nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38.info
From: Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky () isoc org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:16:41 +0100
Hi, Jared Mauch wrote on 1/28/14 9:03 PM:
I'd rather share some data and how others can observe this to determine how we can approach a fix. Someone spoofing your IP address out some other carrier is something you may be interested to know about, even if you have a non-spoofing network.
At the Internet Society we are flashing out an idea of an anti-spoofing "movement", where ISPs can list themselves as not spoofing-capable on our website. The requirement is that they can demonstrate that they block spoofed packets, for instance by successfully running the Spoofer test. I think your, Jared, test can add to this picture. Sort of a positive spin on the name and shame technique. It is not ideal, as one test is not a real proof of such capability, but might help raising awareness, at least. Does this sound as something that can be useful and fly? Andrei
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38.info, (continued)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info TGLASSEY (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info David Miller (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Stephen Frost (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Andrei Robachevsky (Jan 29)
- Re: BCP38.info Jared Mauch (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Mark Andrews (Jan 28)
- Re: BCP38.info Andrei Robachevsky (Jan 29)
- Re: BCP38.info TGLASSEY (Jan 28)