nanog mailing list archives

Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:22:20 -0500

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:
* nanog () shankland org (Jim Shankland) [Wed 15 Jan 2014, 18:04 CET]:

So ... RFC1918 addresses for the IXP fabric, then?

(Half kidding, but still ....)


They need to be globally unique.

do they? :)

also... there is/was an exchange in south america (columbia maybe?
it's been a while since I saw this in configs) that used
192.168.0.0/16 space for their exchange.


Current thread: