nanog mailing list archives

Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:43:11 -0500

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:44 , William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
I have to disagree with you. If it appears in a traceroute to
somewhere else, I'd like to be able to ping and traceroute directly to
it. When I can't, that impairs my ability to troubleshoot the all too
common can't-get-there-from-here problems. The more you hide the
infrastructure, the more intractable problems become for your
customers.

The IXP LAN should be reachable from every device on the ASes which
connect to it, not just the immediate router.

We disagree.

Plus, you really can't type "ping" on the router connected to the IXP?

Not when I'm the downstream customer, no. It's jolly good that *you*
can test, but before the rest of us can get through the layers of
support which insulate you, we have to be able to convincingly test
too.


As I know 100% of ISPs (to at least one decimal place) cannot
make such a guarantee, then doing so puts the IXP and all other
members - whether peers of yours or not - at risk. Putting others
at risk because you are lazy or because it makes your life easier
is .. I believe I called it bad manners before.

That makes no sense. The IXP is at no more or less risk from your
customers than any other connection you have for Internet carriage.
Risk which you are responsible for managing either way.


I said in an earlier post that if you carry a prefix I own,
did not announce to you, and make it very clear I
specifically do not want you to carry, I will ask you to
stop or face possible disconnection. [...] That's not your prefix,
you were not given it and told not to carry it, so Do Not Carry It.

Well yes, of course. If you participate in an IXP you follow the rules
of the IXP. I respectfully question the wisdom of such a rule and the
IXPs I deal with only ask that you not announce the IXP prefix
externally. But it's not OK to unilaterally break the IXP's rules,
however poorly conceived.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: