nanog mailing list archives
Re: EIGRP support !Cisco
From: "Nick Olsen" <nick () flhsi com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:52:17 -0500
Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network. OSPF would've been my first choice. Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Nick Hilliard" <nick () foobar org> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 12:50 PM To: nick () flhsi com, nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: EIGRP support !Cisco On 08/01/2014 17:30, Nick Olsen wrote:
Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into
a
network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible.
Why not use isis or ospf? Both are fully vendor neutral, and they both support mpls networks properly. EIGRP has some interesting features, but the vendor tie-in cost is way too high to even consider using it. IGP migration is quite do-able, even for large networks, and all cisco devices which speak EIGRP will also speak at least ospf, if not isis. Nick
Current thread:
- EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Olsen (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Dobbins, Roland (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Hilliard (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Dobbins, Roland (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Ray Soucy (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Olsen (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Dobbins, Roland (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco joel jaeggli (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Hilliard (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Dobbins, Roland (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Olsen (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Christopher Morrow (Jan 08)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Nick Hilliard (Jan 10)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Christopher Morrow (Jan 10)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Jimmy Hess (Jan 24)
- Re: EIGRP support !Cisco Christopher Morrow (Jan 08)