nanog mailing list archives
Re: IXP + government transparency report
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:21:13 -0500
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote:As well as being first to be open-ix certified, I think LINX hit a second first that is as interesting;https://www.linx.net/service/publicpeering/novafiles/nova-usgov-reports.html …and is this function being conducted completely without dependencies inside the U.S.?
Bill, OIX certified organizations must provide an accurate and monthly report on Government Information Requests and actions taken related to the requests. You can see an example here http://xmission.com/transparency With regards to Patriot 215 and FISA 701, there are recommendations for warrant canaries. Obviously, much trickier. I think the point is about leadership and taking small, but giant, steps. I hope that everyone in the infrastructure follows this lead and does exactly the same thing. Best, -M<
Current thread:
- IXP + government transparency report Martin Hannigan (Jan 06)
- Re: IXP + government transparency report Bill Woodcock (Jan 06)
- Re: IXP + government transparency report Martin Hannigan (Jan 06)
- Re: IXP + government transparency report Bill Woodcock (Jan 06)