nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering issue - Possible Juniper to Cisco issue
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:13:59 -0800
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com> wrote:
To all, I (ASR1001) had an experience recently where the Telco (Juniper) told me that I was sending them 1000+ routes when I attempted to re-establish a BGP session; subsequently they would not allow this and they refused the session. I had no sync on and a prefix list so I was advertising only one route. Even though I hard reset the session on my end the Telco for some reason kept seeing me send the routes. I finally called them and had them reset their end and the session came up right away. What the ...
If you leaked once and they have a teardown setup on the Juniper end w/o a timeout, it won't let the neighbor reconnect until the session is cleared. I've seen in IOS 15.x just a few days ago where it had stuck advertising routes that it shouldn't be, though that was between two Sup720 based pieces of gear, so probably unrelated (just a data point that it can/does happen in IOS in general where it's advertising routes that it insists it isn't)
thx Philip
-- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler
Current thread:
- Peering issue - Possible Juniper to Cisco issue Philip Lavine (Feb 28)
- Re: Peering issue - Possible Juniper to Cisco issue Simon Lockhart (Feb 28)
- Re: Peering issue - Possible Juniper to Cisco issue Michael Loftis (Feb 28)