nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filter on IXP


From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:52:58 +0000

On 28/02/2014 15:42, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
Instead, IXPs _could_ enforce BCP38 too. Mapping the route-server's
received routes to ingress _and_ egress ACLs on IXP ports would mitigate
the role of BCP38 offenders within member ports. It's almost like uRPF
in an intelligent and useable form.

this will break horribly as soon as you have an IXP member which provides
transit to other multihomed networks.

Nick



Current thread: