nanog mailing list archives
RE: Filter NTP traffic by packet size?
From: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:26:09 -0800
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Chris Laffin wrote:
Ive talked to some major peering exchanges and they refuse to take any action. Possibly if the requests come from many peering participants it will be taken more seriously?
If only there was more focus on the BCP38 offenders who are the real root cause of this problem, I would be more happy. I would be more impressed if the IXes would start to use their sFlow capabilities to find out what IX ports the NTP queries are coming to backtrace the traffic to the BCP38 offendors than try to block the NTP packets resulting from these src address forged queries. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Filter on IXP, (continued)
- Re: Filter on IXP Jérôme Nicolle (Feb 28)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Saku Ytti (Feb 22)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Laszlo Hanyecz (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? James R Cutler (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Phil Bedard (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Dobbins, Roland (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Dobbins, Roland (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Dobbins, Roland (Feb 20)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Harlan Stenn (Feb 21)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Dobbins, Roland (Feb 20)
- RE: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Phil Bedard (Feb 23)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Brandon Butterworth (Feb 23)
- Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size? Harry Hoffman (Feb 26)