nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamassassin
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:42:57 +0800
They are smart and dkim sign their messages; even though it's invalid I believe that's why it has such a low bayes score.
lots of the spam getting through has no dkim
It's getting marked as ham and not spam. Are you positive your definitions are still updating?
sa-update has run. and it runs cleanly randy
Current thread:
- spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: spamassassin Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)