nanog mailing list archives

Re: ddos attack blog


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:19:42 -0800

On 2/14/14, 3:00 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

I was being a bit extreme, I don't expect UDP to be blocked and there  are
valid uses for NTP and it needs to pass. Can you imagine the trading
servers not having access to NTP? 

Sure.

They could setup internal NTP servers listening to GPS.  Would it be as good 
overall as using external servers?   Probably not, but it might be good 
enough.  I doubt if it would be very high on any trading floors list of nasty 
problems.

They could arrange to poke holes through the generic UDP block - whitelist 
the few known cases where UDP traffic is expected.  Would it be a pain to 
administer?  Probably, but I'll bet it could be made to work.

High value concentrated applications are relatively easy things to get
high quality time to.

it's all the consumer electronics devices and everything that uses
ssl/tls that needs access to time that is a more diffuse and less
tractable problem.

joel




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: