nanog mailing list archives
Re: carrier comparison
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:21:46 +0200
On Friday, February 07, 2014 04:49:09 PM Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Based on my understanding on BFD, it will not help you... BFD will detect the direct connected port being down quicker and force the BGP session down, (faster than the time BGP session timers take to determine something is broken)
You would also need your provider to support BFD (and by support I mostly mean willing to run, as modern gear today is technically capable). Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- carrier comparison Adam Greene (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Joshua Goldbard (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Joshua Goldbard (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Eric Flanery (eric) (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Faisal Imtiaz (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Olivier Benghozi (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Faisal Imtiaz (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 06)
- Re: carrier comparison Olivier Benghozi (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Bryan Socha (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 07)
- Re: carrier comparison Faisal Imtiaz (Feb 07)
- RE: carrier comparison Adam Greene (Feb 08)
- Re: carrier comparison Vlade Ristevski (Feb 11)
- Re: carrier comparison Sam Moats (Feb 06)