nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:20:59 -0500
I here tell the spoofer project people are looking to improve their data and stats... And reporting. On Feb 5, 2014 1:08 PM, "Livingood, Jason" < Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com> wrote:
Cool, thanks for the pointed. Now if we could get the data by ASN and publish it on a site like bcp38.info, that would be awesome. On 2/4/14, 11:03 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:Here's such a report: http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php Frank -----Original Message----- From: Livingood, Jason [mailto:Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:53 PM To: Octavio Alvarez; North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] On 2/4/14, 7:48 PM, "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp () alvarezp ods org> wrote:What I'm failing to understand, and again, please excuse me if I'm oversimplifying, is what data do you need from researchers, specifically. What specific actionable data would be helpful? Why does the lack of the data prevent you from applying an ACL.What I am suggesting is that the community at large needs measurement data, rather than individual network operators (which already know if they do or do not implement BCP38). Only with a long list of operators that DO prevent spoofing and a list of those that DO NOT, backed up with a decent data set (enough measurement points, enough measurement tests, across enough time, with an openly shared methodology), can the community start to encourage non-adopters to change their position. Just my two cents though... Jason
Current thread:
- Re: Why won't providers source-filter attacks? Simple., (continued)
- Re: Why won't providers source-filter attacks? Simple. Livingood, Jason (Feb 07)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Jay Ashworth (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] goemon (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Tony Tauber (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Livingood, Jason (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Octavio Alvarez (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Livingood, Jason (Feb 04)
- RE: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Frank Bulk (Feb 04)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Livingood, Jason (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Robert Drake (Feb 06)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Jay Ashworth (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- BCP38 is hard; let's go shopping! Jay Ashworth (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 is hard; let's go shopping! joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 is hard; let's go shopping! Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Seth Mattinen (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Jay Ashworth (Feb 05)
- Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] Mark Tinka (Feb 05)