nanog mailing list archives
Re: Updated ARIN allocation information
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:58:26 -0500
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Tore Anderson <tore () fud no> wrote:
What I fail to understand from this thread is the apparent expectation that these smaller-than-/24 microscopic delegations from ARIN will be popular.
Hi Tore, There is every expectation that they will be unpopular. They're a hedge against the possibility of a grueling last-minute IPv6 conversion following a failed IPv4 market. They're something that can, with difficulty, be made to work. They serve no other purpose. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Tore Anderson (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information William Herrin (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Bryan Socha (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Bryan Socha (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information George William Herbert (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Tore Anderson (Feb 01)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Bryan Socha (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information William Herrin (Jan 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Brett Frankenberger (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Jan 31)