nanog mailing list archives
Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission...
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:22:08 +0000
On 11/29/14, 12:26 PM, "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca> wrote:
However, in the case of SMTP, due to the amount of spam, most ISPs break "network neutrality" by blocking outbound port 25 for instance
Whatever Net Neutrality may mean this week, it is usually intended to allow for reasonable network management practices, including preventing network abuse. In the case of port blocking, it is permissible provided it is disclosed transparently. - Jason
Current thread:
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Livingood, Jason (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Livingood, Jason (Dec 01)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Owen DeLong (Dec 03)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Owen DeLong (Dec 03)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... John R. Levine (Dec 03)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Owen DeLong (Dec 03)