nanog mailing list archives
Re: Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 07:35:28 -0700
On Aug 5, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
Is there any way we could stop this discussion until we can get some participants who have experience doing things like emergency post-ice-storm overhead circuit restoration to show up and explain exactly why charging a small one-time fee for a fiber from A to Z is probably not a sustainable model?
I completely agree that XC without MRC is an unsustainable model, but I believe only one person proposed that, so I don’t think calling for an end to the discussion just because you realize what everyone but one person does is warranted.
In the meantime, I'd like to see the city where an ISP can buy as many of the microducts as they want. I'd like to buy them all, please... though I have no intention of running anything though them, as I'm an investor in the local cable TV company.
Which seems to support my argument for direct fiber PREM<->Serving Wire Center. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics, (continued)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Eugeniu Patrascu (Aug 05)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 06)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Matthew Kaufman (Aug 06)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Matthew Kaufman (Aug 05)
- Re: Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Rob Seastrom (Aug 05)
- Re: Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Owen DeLong (Aug 07)