nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:44:28 +0200
On Friday, August 01, 2014 09:30:57 AM mcfbbqroast . wrote:
I think this is a sector the government would do well in. Unlike being an actual ISP there's no ambiguity (oversubscription, customer service, etc). Just provide a gigabit line with no congestion and solid uptime, or a fibre pair with solid uptime. End of story.
Couldn't agree more :-). Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 02)