nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shaw routing issue 12 Aug 2014


From: Pete Lumbis <alumbis () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:07:08 -0400

Yep. Most of the time I've seen this it's two data centers, both go TCAM
exception. You reboot DC1, when it comes back up you reboot DC2. This means
no iBGP learned routes so DC1 is fine. DC 2 is fine, until the iBGP peer
comes back and then start all over again.


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Geoffrey Keating <geoffk () geoffk org> wrote:

Pete Lumbis <alumbis () gmail com> writes:

Maybe related to the 512k route issue?
http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/

I've seen people reboot to recover from TCAM exception without adjusting
TCAM size only to run into the issue all over again. It's a fun way to
watch the problems roll around the network.

In this case, it would probably have "helped" in the same way as
rebooting or waving a rubber chicken or whatever sometimes "helps": the
route issue was caused initially by a problem at Verizon that
caused them to deaggregate, which they fixed, so by the time someone had
identified the problem, paged someone, gotten them to the data center,
had a teleconference, rebooted the device, waited for it to come back
up...  Verizon would have fixed it, so when it came back up it'd be
back under 512k again.



Current thread: