![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:34:22 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:06 PM, McElearney, Kevin < Kevin_McElearney () cable comcast com> wrote:http://www.zdnet.com/internet-hiccups-today-youre-not-alone-heres-why-70000 32566/ "According to NANOG, and complaints tracker DownDetector, many Internet providers ÿÿ including Comcast, Level3, AT&T, Cogent, Sprint, Verizon, and others ÿÿ have suffered from serious performance problems at various times on Tuesday.ÿÿ While we had a few multi-homed customers have problems with their routers, we did not see anything in the core. Is this just a ZDNET reporting error?Unless you guys are miraculously managing to terminate Nx100G bundles into 6509s with Sup2 or sup3s, I would be really, really surprised if this even made it on your radar. Chalk it up to poorly-researched reporting.
There are/have been multiple fiber provider outages the past two days, but I suspect there's always a fiber cut / outage somewhere.
And if you *are* handling Nx100G bundles on 6509s, please contact me off-list, I need to get the details on your source for magic router pixie dust. ;)
Cisco white papers. Where else? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 12)
- Re: ****SPAM:5.2**** Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Matthew Petach (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Warren Kumari (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today joel jaeggli (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Geoff Huston (Aug 13)