nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:33:05 +1000
On 27 Apr 2014, at 5:19 am, Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> wrote:
Historic event - 500K prefixes on the Internet.And now we wait for everything to fall over at 512k ;)Based on a quick plot graph on the CIDR report, it looks like we are adding 6,000 prefixes a month, or thereabouts. So platforms that break at 512K die in two months or less? Sup720s may need to be reconfigured/rebooted, etc. Does anyone have doomsday plots of IPv6 prefixes? We are already at something like 20,000 prefixes there, and a surprising number of deaggregates (like /64s) in the global table. IIRC, a bunch of platforms will fall over at 128K/256K IPv6 prefixes (but sooner, really, because of IPv4 dual stack).
Check out pages 30 and 34 of http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2014-02-09-bgp2013.pdf - a presentation I gave on predictions of BGP table size at NANOG 60 in February of this year. Geoff
Current thread:
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 30)
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report joel jaeggli (Apr 30)
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Sholes, Joshua (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Dealing with auditors (was Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report) Larry Sheldon (Apr 30)
- Re: Dealing with auditors (was Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report) William Herrin (Apr 30)
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Rick Astley (Apr 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Seth Mos (Apr 26)
- RE: The Cidr Report Deepak Jain (Apr 26)
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Apr 27)
- Re: The Cidr Report Fred Baker (fred) (Apr 30)