nanog mailing list archives

Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls


From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:51:03 -0700

While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been burned, often more than once, by the pain of 
re-numbering internal services at static addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem.

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Apr 17, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com> wrote:

On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Sander Steffann wrote:

Also, I note your draft is entitled "Requirements for IPv6 Enterprise
Firewalls." Frankly, no "enterprise" firewall will be taken seriously
without address-overloaded NAT. I realize that's a controversial
statement in the IPv6 world but until you get past it you're basically
wasting your time on a document which won't be useful to industry.

I disagree. While there certainly will be organisations that want such a 'feature' it is certainly not a requirement 
for every (I hope most, but I might be optimistic) enterprises.

And I not only agree with Sander, but would also argue for a definitive statement in a document like this 
SPECIFICALLY to help educate the enterprise networking community on how to implement a secure border for IPv6 without 
the need for NAT.  Having a document to point at that has been blessed by the IETF/community is key to helping 
recover the end-to-end principle.  Such a document may or may not be totally in scope for a "firewall" document, but 
should talk about concepts like default-deny inbound traffic, stateful inspection and the use of address space that 
is not announced to the Internet and/or is completely blocked at borders for all traffic.

Heck, we could even make it less specific to IPv6 and create a document that describes these concepts and show how 
NAT is not necessary nor wise for IPv4, either.  (Yes, yes, other than address conservation.)

-- 
Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:  2269442
                                                        Skype:  brandonross
Schedule a meeting:  http://www.doodle.com/bross



Current thread: