nanog mailing list archives
Re: DMARC -> CERT?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:34:35 -0400
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700, Private Sender said:
I'm sorry but is there a fundamental misunderstanding of dmarc going on in this thread?
Yes, apparently mostly on the part of Yahoo apologists...
There is no need to flame a company because they implemented a policy to ensure QoS to their customers. Either push your mail through their servers, or Just find somewhere else you can push your mailing lists through.
Is it me, or has every single Yahoo apologist in this thread insisted on this same misrepresentation of the situation?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: DMARC -> CERT?, (continued)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Scott Howard (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Scott Howard (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Scott Howard (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Private Sender (Apr 16)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 16)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Private Sender (Apr 17)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Michael Thomas (Apr 17)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 17)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Michael Thomas (Apr 17)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 17)
- Message not available
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Larry Sheldon (Apr 16)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 16)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? John Levine (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Leo Bicknell (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)