nanog mailing list archives

RE: Chronic Abnormal Traceroutes Traversing Level 3


From: Jack Stonebraker <Jack.Stonebraker () mygrande com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:25:25 +0000

Ah Ha!  Thanks Nick and Trent!  Well that explains the path being even at the MPLS cloud.

JJ Stonebraker
IP Network Engineering
Grande Communications
512.878.5627
________________________________
From: Trent Farrell [mailto:tfarrell () riotgames com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 11:19 AM
To: Jack Stonebraker
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Chronic Abnormal Traceroutes Traversing Level 3

RTT gets calculated before the packet enters a MPLS network.

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jack Stonebraker <Jack.Stonebraker () mygrande com<mailto:Jack.Stonebraker () mygrande 
com>> wrote:
If there's anybody from Level 3 Transport available, I'd like to discuss some bizarre results when traversing through 
your network, namely in Dallas, TX over the past few months?  I'm working this through your NOC as well, but figured I 
would cover all avenues as this issue is pretty chronic.

Taken from your Looking Glass in Dallas to a destination of 195.110.36.136


1 vlan70.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://vlan70.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.145.126) 120 msec

    vlan60.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://vlan60.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.145.62) 120 msec

    vlan80.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://vlan80.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.145.190) 120 msec

  2 ae-93-93.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-93-93.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.170) 120 msec

    ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.146) 120 msec

    ae-63-63.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-63-63.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.134) 120 msec

  3 ae-7-7.ebr4.Atlanta2.Level3.net<http://ae-7-7.ebr4.Atlanta2.Level3.net> (4.69.134.22) 36 msec 20 msec 20 msec

  4 ae-2-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-2-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.132.86) 120 msec 116 msec 120 
msec

  5 ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.134) 120 msec

    ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.138) 120 msec

    ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.134) 120 msec

  6 ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.157) 120 msec 120 msec

    ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.149) 124 msec

  7 ae-44-44.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-44-44.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.137.61) 120 msec

    ae-42-42.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-42-42.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.137.53) 116 msec 116 msec

  8 ae-62-62.csw1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-62-62.csw1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.94) 124 msec

    ae-72-72.csw2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-72-72.csw2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.98) 120 msec 120 msec

  9 ae-81-81.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.85) 120 msec

    ae-91-91.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-91-91.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.89) 124 msec

    ae-71-71.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-71-71.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.81) 120 msec

 10 ae-41-41.ebr2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-41-41.ebr2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.159.81) 120 msec 120 msec

    ae-43-43.ebr2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-43-43.ebr2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.159.89) 120 msec

 11 ae-12-3202.edge4.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-12-3202.edge4.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.202.182) 116 msec 120 msec 
120 msec

 12 ae-26-26.car2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-26-26.car2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.200.98) 120 msec 120 msec 120 msec

 13 BACKBONE-CO.car2.London2.Level3.net<http://BACKBONE-CO.car2.London2.Level3.net> (195.50.121.50) 120 msec 120 msec 
120 msec

 14  *  *  *

 15  *  *  *

 16  *  *  *

I'm confused how the first and last hops are showing equal latency, while being half way around the world.  I'm also 
confused why it's 120ms to the first hop from a route server local to that market.  While I wouldn't rely on a 
traceroute as a true measurement of end to end latency, I'm having problems explaining to customers experiencing 
tangible issues when their traceroute looks like this:

traceroute source 24.155.144.226 195.110.36.136
traceroute to 195.110.36.136 (195.110.36.136) from 24.155.144.226, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  lag-8-868.ear1.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://lag-8-868.ear1.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.30.74.53)  924.705 ms  545.117 ms  
512.992 ms
 2  4.69.146.5 (4.69.146.5)  124.812 ms 4.69.146.21 (4.69.146.21)  125.686 ms 4.69.146.9 (4.69.146.9)  124.018 ms
     MPLS Label=1965 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 3  ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.146)  125.012 ms 
ae-83-83.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-83-83.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.158)  141.585 ms 
ae-63-63.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net<http://ae-63-63.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net> (4.69.151.134)  125.005 ms
     MPLS Label=1810 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 4  * * *
 5  ae-2-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-2-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.132.86)  126.085 ms  125.994 ms 
 127.148 ms
     MPLS Label=1692 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 6  ae-61-61.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-61-61.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.130)  124.500 ms 
ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.138)  125.369 ms 
ae-61-61.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-61-61.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.130)  124.306 ms
     MPLS Label=1555 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 7  ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.157)  131.126 ms  
128.607 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net> (4.69.134.149)  123.955 ms
     MPLS Label=1636 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 8  ae-42-42.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-42-42.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.137.53)  127.156 ms 
ae-41-41.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-41-41.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.137.49)  125.736 ms 
ae-43-43.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-43-43.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.137.57)  143.070 ms
     MPLS Label=1801 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 9  ae-82-82.csw3.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-82-82.csw3.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.102)  122.998 ms  122.245 ms 
ae-72-72.csw2.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-72-72.csw2.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.98)  124.499 ms
     MPLS Label=1564 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
10  ae-61-61.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-61-61.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.77)  129.705 ms 
ae-81-81.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.85)  122.705 ms 
ae-91-91.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net<http://ae-91-91.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net> (4.69.161.89)  126.454 ms
     MPLS Label=1322 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
11  ae-42-42.ebr2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-42-42.ebr2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.159.85)  126.019 ms  125.672 ms 
ae-44-44.ebr2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-44-44.ebr2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.159.93)  127.026 ms
     MPLS Label=1911 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
12  ae-12-3202.edge4.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-12-3202.edge4.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.202.182)  122.058 ms  124.301 
ms  123.397 ms
     MPLS Label=300112 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
13  ae-26-26.car2.London2.Level3.net<http://ae-26-26.car2.London2.Level3.net> (4.69.200.98)  124.003 ms  124.567 ms  
130.346 ms
14  BACKBONE-CO.car2.London2.Level3.net<http://BACKBONE-CO.car2.London2.Level3.net> (195.50.121.50)  125.316 ms  
125.991 ms  124.968 ms
15  * * *

This also doesn't seem to be circuit specific (Eliminating possible physical circuit errors, etc) as I have a secondary 
10-Gig sourcing out of San Antonio, TX (Which ultimately terminates on your network in Dallas, same as the Austin 
Circuit) which demonstrates similar results (120+ ms at the second hop in Dallas when entering your MPLS cloud).  
Killing the BGP adjacency to both the Austin and San Antonio peers clears the issue up, but obviously that's not a long 
term viable option.  Any help would be appreciated.

JJ Stonebraker
IP Network Engineering
Grande Communications
512.878.5627



--

Trent Farrell

Riot Games

IP Network Engineer

E: tfarrell () riotgames com<mailto:tfarrell () riotgames com> | IE:  +353 86 845 7230 | US: +1 424 285 9825

Summoner name: Foro


Current thread: