nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:02:16 -0400
On 4/9/2014 7:22 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/9/2014 5:11 PM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822 header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :) Jeffand just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that <jeff-kell () utc edu> is a single human and not a list?It is really too bad that there is not place to put a "precedence" that the software could key on--with values like "bulk" or "junk" or "list".
Headers of your message include:
Precedence: list List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/options/nanog>, <mailto:nanog-request () nanog org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/> List-Post: <mailto:nanog () nanog org> List-Help: <mailto:nanog-request () nanog org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:nanog-request () nanog org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+jeff-kell=utc.edu () nanog org Return-Path: nanog-bounces+jeff-kell=utc.edu () nanog org
Proper mail clients can provide "list links" based on the List- headers, but few if any actually do. So take your pick, but my point remains, it still retains:
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:22:51 -0500 From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> Organization: Maybe tomorrow User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 To: <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage
And I'm nowhere mentioned. I only appear in the "envelope RCPT TO:<> RFC821 header", nowhere in the RFC822 header. It's not rocket science if you have headers available (which even Outlook can see, although you have to jump through a few hoops to see them). Jeff Jeff
Current thread:
- Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage, (continued)
- Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 09)
- Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
- Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage George Michaelson (Apr 09)
- Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Jack Bates (Apr 10)
- Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 10)
- Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 09)
- Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Larry Sheldon (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jeff Kell (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 09)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Larry Sheldon (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Rich Kulawiec (Apr 10)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jay Hennigan (Apr 14)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Franck Martin (Apr 20)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Barney Wolff (Apr 20)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage staticsafe (Apr 20)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Franck Martin (Apr 20)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Scott Howard (Apr 20)