nanog mailing list archives
RE: nanog.org website - restored
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:00:06 +0000
Or throw one less gathering a year? Sent from my Mobile Device. -------- Original message -------- From: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com> Date: 10/07/2013 5:53 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>,nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: nanog.org website - restored Yeah isn't there some cloud provider like Amazon, Rackspace, or MS willing to donate some BW and CPU cycles? Would be a drop in the bucket. Phil From: Michael Thomas Sent: 10/7/2013 19:57 To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: nanog.org website - restored On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote:
Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point.
How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
Current thread:
- RE: nanog.org website - restored Phil Bedard (Oct 07)
- RE: nanog.org website - restored Warren Bailey (Oct 07)
- RE: nanog.org website - restored Alex Rubenstein (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: nanog.org website - restored Adam Newman (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Ryan Pavely (Oct 08)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Mark Keymer (Oct 08)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Christopher Morrow (Oct 08)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Ryan Pavely (Oct 08)