nanog mailing list archives
Re: nanog.org website - restored
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:54:08 -0700
On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote:
Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point.
How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
Current thread:
- nanog.org website Andrew Koch (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website Andrew Koch (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website Andrew Koch (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Andrew Koch (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Michael Thomas (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Garrett Skjelstad (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Rubens Kuhl (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored jamie rishaw (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website - restored Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website Andrew Koch (Oct 07)
- Re: nanog.org website Andrew Koch (Oct 07)