nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:21:14 -0400
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, JRC NOC <nospam-nanog () jensenresearch com> wrote:Have we/they lost something important in the changeover to converged mutiprotocol networks? Is there a better way for us edge networks to achieve IP resiliency in the current environment?sadly I bet not, aside from active probing and disabling paths that are non-functional.Um, how about, don't buy services from network providers that fail in this way?
I suppose the question is: "how would you know that any particular network had this failure mode?" until, of course, you run into it... as jrc did...
Current thread:
- BGP failure analysis and recommendations JRC NOC (Oct 23)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Christopher Morrow (Oct 23)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Brandon Ross (Oct 24)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Christopher Morrow (Oct 24)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Brandon Ross (Oct 24)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Brandon Ross (Oct 24)
- RE: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Sam Roche (Oct 24)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Christopher Morrow (Oct 23)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Pete Lumbis (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Courtney Smith (Oct 24)
- Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations Scott Weeks (Oct 24)