nanog mailing list archives

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:24:10 +1100


In message <8738o2poov.fsf () nemi mork no>, =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= writes:
Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> writes:

Actually you just need to *let* the hosts update their own ptr
records using UPDATE.

People keep saying the PTR records don't mean anything yet still
demand really strong authentication for updates of PTR records.
TCP is more than a strong enough authenticator to support update
from self.

You can even delegate the reverse zone when doing or just after a PD.

* Accept NS/DNAME updates for the reverse prefix from any address
  in the delegated address range over TCP.  This avoids having a
  temporatially lame delegation.  named already has code to do this
  for /48's as I coded it to to support 6to4.

This sounded like an excellent idea at first, but then I started
thinking:  As a home user, would I really want to give anyone with
access to my network the right to change my reverse delegation?

Yet this is essentially what 6to4 has been doing for years.  See
RFC 5158.  Sometimes good enough is all that is needed.

One could add a KEY record at the same time as you add the NS/DNAME
records and use SIG(0) to authenticate subsequent updates to the
delegation based on that key.

The DHCP server would clear delegations on new PD presumably using
a TSIG signed UPDATE request.

        if no sig0 then allow update tcp-6to4
        if self-signed the allow update
        if this tsig then allow update

Named already has the concepts of "this tsig", "self-signed",
"tcp-6to4".  It doesn't have the concept of "no sig0" but adding
this sort of thing is relatively straight forward.

A third method would be for the CPE could send a KEY record rdata
in the DHCP PD request that the DHCP server which would add to the
zone with a owner name based on the allocated prefix.  SIG(0) would
then be used to authenticate further update requests at or below
this name.

This is just bolting together existing technologies in more useful
ways.

Mark

I don't think so.  I am not even sure I would want them all to be able
to update the PTR record for the addresses they use.

Bj=C3=B8rn
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: