nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
From: Franck Martin <fmartin () linkedin com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:23:09 +0000
If you want to block spam on IPv6, then you can start by rejecting connections to SMTP from any IPv6 that do not have a PTR. No need to analyze the format of the PTR. It is in several recommendations that a sending email IP must have a PTR. That ISPs will not do a PTR on all IPv6 but only on static IPv6, improves the spam blocking feature above. No need to maintain list of dynamic IP space...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR, (continued)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Livingood, Jason (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Blair Trosper (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John Levine (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Lee Howard (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Franck Martin (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Paul Ferguson (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John Levine (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Blair Trosper (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Brielle Bruns (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Andrew Sullivan (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Jimmy Hess (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR - DNSSEC bmanning (Oct 14)