nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:48:33 -0700
On 10/14/13 3:30 PM, staticsafe wrote:
On 10/14/2013 18:00, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:Which other provider? Please name at least one. Other providers either offer IPv6, or don't. When those other providers do, good or bad, you can connect to any other IPv6 network (well, except maybe for Cogent's AS174). When Cogent offers IPv6, a lot of IPv6 networks are unreachable. No other provider comes close. I mean, even their web-site doesn't work from many IPv6-connected hosts, because there's no route for their network: li163-XXX:~# telnet cogentco.com http Trying 2001:550:1::cc01... ^C li163-XXX:~# C.Fremont Linode? I see it is unreachable from my ARP Networks VPS (HE v6 transit) and also from behind my HE tunnel at home.
HE and Cogen't don't peer, even after the cake. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver, (continued)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Brent Jones (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Robert Glover (Oct 14)
- RE: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Eric C. Miller (Oct 24)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Blake Dunlap (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver staticsafe (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Seth Mattinen (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Matthew Petach (Oct 18)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)