nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:08:48 -0500
Once upon a time, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com> said:
That's not necessarily true -- some (very large) organizations using DMARC will reject mail from hosts without a PTR record.
And that's a good reason to have reverse records for you mail servers. Auto-generated reverse really shouldn't be trusted for anything. -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Current thread:
- comcast ipv6 PTR Blair Trosper (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Robert Webb (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Paul Ferguson (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Livingood, Jason (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Blair Trosper (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John Levine (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Robert Webb (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 09)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Lee Howard (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 14)