nanog mailing list archives

Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size


From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:37:47 -0500

On 9/27/2013 1:10 AM, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
I don't respond to many of these threads but I have to say I've
contested this one too only to have to beaten into my head that a /64
is "appropriate".. it still hasn't stuck, but unfortunately rfc's for
other protocols depend on the blocks to now be a /64..

It's a waste, even if we're "planning for the future", no one house
needs a /64 sitting on their lan.. or at least none I can sensibly
think of o_O.


Are you accounting for connections to your refrigerator, water heater, razor, vibrator, and on down to list so the gubermint can tell they when you can use power for them?

--
Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
                                        of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
                                        learn from their mistakes.
                                          (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)


Current thread: