nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT64 and matching identities
From: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:36:50 -0500
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:06:52PM -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
Other IPv6 transition mechanisms appear to be no less thorny than NAT64 for a variety of reasons.
Some of us who worked on the NAT64/DNS64 combination were content that it was a long way from the perfect solution. The idea I at least had was to get something that mostly worked most of the time, and was simple enough that anyone could basically understand it. Nevertheless, I have to admit that it's a pig. That piggishness was not something I wanted to get rid of. I thought (and still think) that if the transition mechanisms are awful enough, it will encourage moving things to v6 for real so that we can get rid of the kludges. Perhaps this is wishful thinking, however. In any case, I'm sorry to have contributed in some little way to this headache of yours. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan Dyn, Inc. asullivan () dyn com v: +1 603 663 0448
Current thread:
- NAT64 and matching identities Justin M. Streiner (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Tom Taylor (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Paul WALL (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Lee Howard (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Andrew Sullivan (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Fred Baker (fred) (Nov 19)
- RE: NAT64 and matching identities Don Bowman (Nov 19)
- RE: NAT64 and matching identities Ian Smith (Nov 19)
- RE: NAT64 and matching identities Justin M. Streiner (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Lee Howard (Nov 20)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Gary E. Miller (Nov 20)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Lee Howard (Nov 20)
- RE: NAT64 and matching identities Tony Hain (Nov 22)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: NAT64 and matching identities Tom Taylor (Nov 18)