nanog mailing list archives
Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:24:00 -0400
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, "Scott Weeks" said:
You haven't been here long have you... He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does not get UCE from posting to NANOG.
Actually, I think Thomas Cannon was making the opposite point - that if he's going to spam us all with a 260 word disclaimer, it could have been expanded to 263 words and add 'No cold calls'. Or just have that and lose the other 260 words that make absolutely no sense on a NANOG posting.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Looking for Netflow analysis package, (continued)
- RE: Looking for Netflow analysis package Harry Hoffman (May 14)
- Looking for Netflow analysis package Laura Smith (May 16)
- RE: Looking for Netflow analysis package Meshier, Brent (May 16)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Thomas Cannon (May 16)
- RE: Looking for Netflow analysis package Meshier, Brent (May 16)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Scott Weeks (May 16)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Tim Vollebregt (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package JP (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Harry Hoffman (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Cameron Daniel (May 19)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Rinse Kloek (May 20)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Tim Vollebregt (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package John Starta (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Phil Fagan (May 17)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package Jimmy Hess (May 18)