nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISIS and OSPF together
From: Jen Linkova <furry13 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 01:31:30 +1000
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
I would like to understand the scenarios wherein the service provider/network admin might run both ISIS and OSPF together inside their network. Is this something that really happens out there? One scenario that i can think of when somebody might run the 2 protocols ISIS and OSPF together for a brief period is when the admin is migrating from one IGP to the other. The other instance would be when say OSPF is used to manage the OOB network and the ISIS is used for network reachability.
Is there any other scenario?
There is still equipment around which doesn't support ISIS but support OSPF. Getting such boxes into a network which is using ISIS might lead to running both protocols together. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
Current thread:
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together, (continued)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Peter Ehiwe (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Mikael Abrahamsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together vijay gill (May 19)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Scott Morris (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Måns Nilsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jen Linkova (May 15)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jayram Deshpande (May 15)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Brandon Butterworth (May 19)