nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:51:58 -0430
Hi, On 3/29/13, Patrick <nanog () haller ws> wrote:
On 2013-03-29 14:49, William Herrin wrote:I've long thought router vendors should introduce a configuration option to specify the IP address from which ICMP errors are emitted rather than taking the interface address from which the packet causing the error was received.Concur. An 'ip(v6)? icmp source-interface loop0' sure beats running 'ip unnumbered loop0' everywhere. ;)
Why do you think it will be better?, can you explain? So far I can only think in a more difficult troubleshooting if this idea/feature gets spread. I guess based in the scenario where the output interface can not reach Internet sounds as a practical solution however for sure the output interface is reachable inside the provider network. Thks, Alejandro,
Current thread:
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering, (continued)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jeff Kell (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering William Herrin (Mar 29)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Patrick (Mar 29)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Alejandro Acosta (Mar 29)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering William Herrin (Mar 29)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Alejandro Acosta (Mar 30)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering - folo Saku Ytti (Mar 30)