Re: BCP38 needs advertising

[Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>]

    Noted.

    But today's contribution by Eric M. Caroll might end up on the front
page =D.

    I got the domains...  Now I just need a few free hours to setup
something useful.

    As always, don't be shy to drop me contribution offlist.   

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 03/27/13 14:31, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> But of course. :-)
>
> Also, just saw this:
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
> - ferg
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com> wrote:
>
> >         And do not forget ....
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38
> >
> > :)
> >
> > -as
> >
> >
> > On 3/27/13 2:17 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> > > Please reference:
> > >
> > > http://openresolverproject.org/
> > > http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/
> > > http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack
> > >
> > > ...and anything else to raise the awareness level.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > - ferg (co-perpetrator of BCP38)  :-)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> wrote:
> > >
> > > >     bcp38.org coming soon =D
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > > > Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net
> > > > PubNIX Inc.
> > > > 50 boul. St-Charles
> > > > P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
> > > > Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
> > > >
> > > > On 03/27/13 11:20, Jack Bates wrote:
> > > > > Outside of needing more details and examples, BCP38 could use more
> > > > > advertising.
> > > > >
> > > > > The best option, if they would accept it, is to have all RIRs mention
> > > > > BCP38 as well as require that mention of BCP38 be included in all IP
> > > > > justification requests to customers (so that those who receive
> > > > > netblocks from their ISPs are also aware of it).
> > > > >
> > > > > For ARIN, at least, having it mentioned in the attestation process
> > > > > wouldn't be a bad idea. At least someone of management would be aware
> > > > > of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The only issue is see concerning the RIRs is that they may object to
> > > > > it being out of scope to their duties. However, informing people of
> > > > > something is not requiring implementation of something. On the other
> > > > > hand, we know that there are a great number of networks that don't
> > > > > participate with the community at large and may have no idea about
> > > > > BCP38 and why it is important.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jack