nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing table go boom
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:23:08 +0200
I certainly think there's a lot that can be done at middle-layers, eg: tunnels to a few different providers. I can be on a Comcast CM and ATT DSL link and establish a link to a tunnel destination in Chicago that is low-latency for me and the bits will all flow that way. The last mile loop problem though?
sweden and japan, among others, have some experiences (good and mediocre) in this area randy
Current thread:
- Re: routing table go boom, (continued)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Sander Steffann (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Mike (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Matthew Walster (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: routing table go boom Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom (was: Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification) Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Doug Barton (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 19)