nanog mailing list archives

Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification

From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:59:42 -0400

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:

Juniper is actually closer
given their internal ethernet connection model.  Basically the question
is why is an RE/RP specific to a particular chassis, or even vendor?


openflow/sdn/pce ... congrats! you predicted correctly!

Current thread:

Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification, (continued)
- - - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Doug Barton (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
    - RE: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Adam Vitkovsky (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Randy Bush (Mar 19)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Aled Morris (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Owen DeLong (Mar 20)

(Thread continues...)