nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:26:24 +0100
Hi,
First of all, multihomed sites with its own global routing table entries bloats the global routing table, which is the major cause of global routing table bloat and is not acceptable.
Sorry, but that is false. Looking at the CIDR report (http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Gains) the routing table could shrink from 449k to 258k just by aggregating announcements. That's a reduction of 42.5%. I can't see how multihomed end-site announcements can be worst than that... There would almost be no routing table left ;-) Anyway... Drifting off-topic for this thread. Sander
Current thread:
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification], (continued)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Mark Andrews (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] John Curran (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] John Curran (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Jimmy Hess (Mar 22)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
- Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Andrew D Kirch (Mar 20)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 20)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Sander Steffann (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Joe Abley (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)