nanog mailing list archives
Re: internet in the box
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:11:14 -0400
On 2013-03-10, at 15:02, Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote:
I suspect the amount of fade glass will provide would make this a last resort solution. Unless you did a 900mhz point to point with some yagis.
I suspect the general answer is you do whatever you can to make things work.
I can't think of a reason you would have to provide data, most people have 3/4g to begin with. If it's for booth ops, I would think that cellular router would be the best choice. Most of the times our booth rides our private satellite network, so we just deal with the latency. If you could live with 800ms rtt, get a vsat.. :)
The original question (IIRC) was how to provide conference-style wifi with no wired back-haul, so given that I presume that the option "don't provide conference-style wifi at all" does not meet the requirements :-) Joe
Current thread:
- RE: internet in the box, (continued)
- RE: internet in the box Eric Wieling (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box PC (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box joel jaeggli (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box Seth Mos (Mar 09)
- Re: internet in the box Josh Baird (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box Brandon Ross (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box Masataka Ohta (Mar 10)
- Re: internet in the box bross (Mar 10)
- Re: internet in the box Joe Abley (Mar 10)
- Re: internet in the box Warren Bailey (Mar 10)
- Re: internet in the box Joe Abley (Mar 10)
- Re: internet in the box Brandon Ross (Mar 08)
- Re: internet in the box John Osmon (Mar 10)