RE: Comcast NOC Contact

[Vinod K <vinod408 () hotmail com>]

Eugen and NANOG I'm sorry.  My earlier comment was from conversation my last employer had about peering with Comcast 
where they told us they had balanced ratios.  You can see from Ren Provo that is no longer true.  This is politics as 
usual, playing the silly game.  I am sorry to offend.  I wish they work things out with Google so Youtube will stop 
buffering.

Regards
Vinod

> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:16:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: Comcast NOC Contact
> From: eugen () imacandi net
> To: nanog () nanog org
>
> My comment was more or less directed to the person that said "losts of
> people want to send traffic to comcast, but no one wants to send money". I
> find it very dangerous and provocative, and somewhat on the same line with
> others that believe in the "sender party pays" crap they're trying to force
> onto the market.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jamie Bowden <jamie () photon com> wrote:
>
> > > From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eugen () imacandi net]
> >
> >
> > > Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whatever
> > > they
> > > want from other networks. With that money, Comcast should invest in
> > > infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't this
> > > how IPSs work ? :)
> >
> > In competitive markets, that's the theory.  That would require one to test
> > with...
> >
> > Jamie