nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 address conservation method
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:30:01 -0500
On 6/5/13, rdrake <rdrake () direcpath com> wrote:
On 2013-06-05 18:25, Ricky Beam wrote:
[snip]
(And I'm not too happy with the BS 32 interface limit for multicast routing.)Actually, I'd love to see the pages of tweaks. Seems like it would be useful if I need to do this in the future :)
The great thing about open sourced operating system kernels is if an arbitrary limit or system misbehavior causes you problems, or a tweak is needed to fix incorrect behavior, you can work out a patch to correct the situation -- or add an optional configuration setting to fix the problem, and submit the improvement to the maintainer in the form of a patch. :) -- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 address conservation method, (continued)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Ricky Beam (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Bjørn Mork (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Jimmy Hess (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Bjørn Mork (Jun 07)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method rdrake (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)