nanog mailing list archives

Re: 10gig coast to coast


From: Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:15:58 -0600

Sorry; yes Sawtooth is the more accurate term. I see this on a daily
occurance with large data-set transfers; generally if the data-set is large
multiples of the initial window. I've never tested medium latency(
<100ms) with small enough payloads where it may pay-off threading out many
thousands of sessions. However, medium latency with large files (50M-10G)
threads well in the sub 200 range and does a pretty good job at filling
several Gig links. None of this is scientific; just my observations from
the wild.....infulenced by end to end tunings per environment.




On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz () ericsson com>wrote:

Thanks Fred. Sawtooth is more familiar.
How much of that do you actually see in practice?

Cheers,
Jakob.


On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:27 AM, "Fred Reimer" <freimer () freimer org> wrote:

It is also called a "sawtooth" or similar terms.  Just google "tcp
sawtooth" and you will see many references, and images that depict the
traffic pattern.

HTH,

Fred Reimer | Secure Network Solutions Architect
Presidio | www.presidio.com <http://www.presidio.com/>
3250 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 360, Oakland Park, FL 33309
D: 954.703.1490 | C: 954.298.1697 | F: 407.284.6681 |
freimer () presidio com
CCIE 23812, CISSP 107125, HP MASE, TPCSE 2265




On 6/18/13 9:20 AM, "Jakob Heitz" <jakob.heitz () ericsson com> wrote:

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:04:52 -0600
From: Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com>
... you could always
thread the crap out of whatever it is your transactioning across the
link
to make up for TCP's jackknifes...

What is a TCP jackknife?

Cheers.
Jakob.






-- 
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618


Current thread: