nanog mailing list archives
IP4 address conservation method
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 00:34:01 +0200 (CEST)
I read: http://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/tues.general.Papandreou.conservation.24.pdfI would like to point out RFC 3069. On most cisco equipment this is done using static routes and "ip unnumbered".
So my question is basically: What am I missing? Why can't data center guys not build their network the same way regular ETTH is done? Either one vlan per customer and sharing the IPv4 subnet between several vlans, or having several customers in the same vlan but use antispoofing etc (IETF SAVI-wg functionality) to handle the security stuff?
One vlan per customer also works very well with IPv6. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 04)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Blake Hudson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Tore Anderson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Blake Hudson (Jun 06)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Dan White (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method Ricky Beam (Jun 05)
- Re: IP4 address conservation method William Herrin (Jun 05)