nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prism continued
From: Noon Silk <noonslists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:02:08 +1000
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com> wrote:
In the PRISM context, I highly doubt their using Splunk for any kind of analysis beyond systems and network management. It's not good at indexing non-texty-things. What if you need to search for events that were geographically proximate to one another? That takes a special kind of index.
I was under the impression stuff like Palantir was used a bit, in this context (but I don't even have nth-hand evidence for that.) -- Noon Silk
Current thread:
- Prism continued Warren Bailey (Jun 09)
- Re: Prism continued Daniel Rohan (Jun 09)
- Re: Prism continued Bacon Zombie (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Phil Fagan (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Mike Hale (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Jeff Kell (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Chip Marshall (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Jonathan Lassoff (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Eugen Leitl (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Noon Silk (Jun 13)
- Re: Prism continued Bacon Zombie (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Charles Wyble (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Daniel Rohan (Jun 09)
- Re: Prism continued Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Paul Ferguson (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Rich Kulawiec (Jun 13)
- Re: Prism continued Andrew Carey (Jun 13)
- Re: Prism continued goemon (Jun 12)
- Re: Prism continued Jon Lewis (Jun 13)
- Re: Prism continued Matthew Petach (Jun 15)
- Re: Prism continued Mark Gauvin (Jun 15)