nanog mailing list archives
Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers
From: Job Snijders <job.snijders () atrato com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:23:35 +0200
Hi,
The alternative is to expect "networks" with 100s or 1000s of locations to burn 100s or 1000s of ASNs. Which I think is a bit silly. Hence my question about possibly changing the rules.
I see no issue with that, we have an ASN pool of roughly 4294967280 ASNs. There is no shortage. Also BCP6 section 5 [1] would support the philosophy to just get more ASNs when you need to manage multiple islands. Kind regards, Job [1] - http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp6#section-5
Current thread:
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers, (continued)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Joe Provo (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
- RE: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Adam Vitkovsky (Jun 18)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Bruce Pinsky (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Bruce Pinsky (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Dan (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 10)
- Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Brandon Ross (Jun 10)
- RE: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)