nanog mailing list archives

Re: .nyc - here we go...


From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:42:32 -0300

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ted Cooper
<ml-nanog090304q () elcsplace com>wrote:

On 03/07/13 11:12, Scott Weeks wrote:
"As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City"

Do they have DNSSEC from inception? It would seem a sensible thing to do
for a virgin TLD.


All new gTLDs are required to be DNSSEC-signed. The requirement only
applies to the parent zone, unless registry policy dictates otherwise, so
we can expect many more DS records in the root but a similar DS rate for
2LDs to other gTLDs, likely to be less than 1%:
http://scoreboard.verisignlabs.com/percent-trace.png


Rubens


Current thread: