nanog mailing list archives
Re: .nyc - here we go...
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:42:32 -0300
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ted Cooper <ml-nanog090304q () elcsplace com>wrote:
On 03/07/13 11:12, Scott Weeks wrote:"As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City"Do they have DNSSEC from inception? It would seem a sensible thing to do for a virgin TLD.
All new gTLDs are required to be DNSSEC-signed. The requirement only applies to the parent zone, unless registry policy dictates otherwise, so we can expect many more DS records in the root but a similar DS rate for 2LDs to other gTLDs, likely to be less than 1%: http://scoreboard.verisignlabs.com/percent-trace.png Rubens
Current thread:
- .nyc - here we go... Scott Weeks (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Ted Cooper (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)